: Some people are convinced that mature age employees are beneficial to a company. Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence more beneficial to a company. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Grey-haired employees have been serious contenders to young work force in the modern working sectors.
Presently, some people are of the opinion that well matured employees are lucrative for the progress and bright future of a company. By contrast, others advocate that young workers can contribute remarkably in the overall development of a corporation. Here, I would like to account for both the views with my perception.
There are manifold point to shore up the former view. First and foremost, the vast experience and knowledge of senior employees make them more valuable for a working sector. To demonstrate, experienced aged workers have ability to do the work more effectively and accurately; simultaneously, the chances of errors are negligible. In addition, ageing employees can make superior decisions to prevent the companies from a massive loss during the time of recession. Consequently, old employees are believed to be the real asset for a working sector. Furthermore, unlike young people, adult workers have more patience, tolerance and discipline to deal with pressure situations and heavy workload. Therefore, such traits make them matchless and their importance in the working sector is the need of an hour. On the contrary, others have conflicting views.
They thinks that young employees are technically advanced, well qualified and more skilful and therefore they can be more productive for the business firms. To illustrate, young employees can operate the latest machines and equipments deliberately whereas old workers often resist the usage of new technology in a working sector because of their orthodox thinking. Adding to it, young employees have done both practical and theoretical studies that make them more skilful to do the work more quickly and efficiently as compare to senior aged workers. Last but not the least, young people are more creative, adaptive and energetic in comparison to their counterparts. Thus, the role of young talent to lift up the status of a working sector is terrific.
In my notion, both the aspects hold their valid ground. Undeniably, it is true that the older you get, the wiser you become and therefore adults employees remain in the priority list of companies. However, underestimating the power of youth is a fools paradise. Therefore, a healthy ratio of both the work forces can be quite handy to ensure the best outcomes for a business organization.
To recapitulate, employees are called the backbone of a company. In todays competitive era, a combination of old and young work force should be the motto of modern working sectors
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry, others have conflicting views. They thinks that young employees are tec...
^^^
Line 8, column 6, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'think'
Suggestion: think
...rs have conflicting views. They thinks that young employees are technically ad...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fools'' or 'fool's'?
Suggestion: fools'; fool's
...underestimating the power of youth is a fools paradise. Therefore, a healthy ratio of...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, in addition, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29326923077 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92369363434 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 688.5 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8613699145 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7391304348 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0869565217 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5652173913 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231920246815 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694130890026 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063520640286 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120206686064 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635209816679 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.