Some people argue that the government should spend money on public services and facilities but not on the arts Do you agree or disagree

It is considered that services and facilities for wider population rather than the arts should be financially supported by the government. I partly agree with this opinion, due to the significance of the system serving the public, however, the arts also plays an important role in this system.

Firstly, I believe that the power holders should invest money in serving citizens in forms of providing facilities and infrastructures. These services are essentially needed by everyone in a society and can only be established by the government, whose job is collecting the tax to support the public. People need to be supported for their daily lives in terms of accommodation, transportation, healthcare, education and food catering. These facilities are usually large amount of buildings, roads in and between cities, underground railways, built with well organised management and big expenditure. Given tax money monthly by the population, it is the decision makers’ responsibility to be in charge of managing fund into public services, making sure people’s donations meet their true interests.

However, some argued that the public interests do not include the arts, so that it should not be funded by the government. I do not agree with that as I think the arts considerably facilitate the citizens in various ways. Art spaces such as museums, art galleries, musical halls often are the most popular locations in cities, entertaining overwhelming numbers of population every year. Art education is chosen by more and more youngsters, for its multicultural knowledge deepening students’ understanding into public society. To serve the public better, the government should support art spaces and education, as they are demanded part of the majority.

In conclusion, the government’s expenditure should cover public services and facilities, as well as the arts, because they benefit a wide ranges of population and can only be managed by large funds.

Votes
Average: 4.4 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45573770492 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15781451781 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570491803279 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4203444091 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320015713824 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106046983031 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542917437941 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177861602125 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551695053543 0.056905535591 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.