Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Other say that only a few wild animals should be protected. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that people should only protect a small number of wild animals, while others believe that all wildlife animals need preservation. I completely agree with the second view that protection for all animals should be conducted in order to reach sustainable development for the future of human beings.
On the one hand, there are some reasons explained why just a few endangered animals should be preserved. Firstly, the cost of protecting all wild animals is far from the budget of many countries, especially the underdeveloped and developing nations. In these countries, the public funding provided for social services and welfare has more significantly taken into consideration than the expenses for wildlife preservation. Secondly, there is a belief that it is fair enough to just protect the animals which are on the brink of extinction. The habitat destruction of these species will not play a serious impact on the environment of human and therefore people are not responsible for protecting all wildlife animals.
On the other hand, there is a fact confirmed by many scientists that in order to achieve sustainable development, it is necessary to keep wildlife as much natural as possible. This is also an effective prevention measure protecting the earth from being significantly degradable. Apart from the government funds, every individual can contribute to the wildlife preservation and green movement by small but meaningful activities, such as stopping eating out in wild restaurants, taking part in charity programs in localities to planting a tree and re-growing the forests. Such useful acts will extremely alleviate the effects on wildlife animals.
To conclude, I believe that all countries worldwide should participate in the general mission of protecting wildlife animals, not only the small number of endangered species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-01 | nguyentranvn | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | yjjjj | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-18 | ththaian | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-09 | kellychichi | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show the proportion of energy produced by different sources in one country in 1985 and 2003
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Other say that only a few wild animals should be protected Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The pie charts below show the proportion of energy produced by different sources in one country in 1985 and 2003
- The pie chart below shows information about where coffee is produced consumed and where its profit goes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... argued that people should only protect a small number of wild animals, while others believe that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41868512111 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04908892683 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56401384083 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9062981968 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350857479855 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130312706735 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108828019595 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229135525769 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124641871472 0.056905535591 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.