Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others
say that only a few wild animals should be protected. Discuss both views and
give your opinion.
Nowadays, with the rising of digital facilities, animals can be seen from everywhere all over the world and are adored by many people. While many activists say that all animals should be protected from dangers, I agree with those who thinks there should be a priority to decide which species should be sheltered and which are not.
On the one hand, protecting all animals seems to be a brilliant idea. Poaching is a major issue nowadays, it is making many species of animals extinct, especially highly valuable ones. When all of them are put away from human touch, which will prohibit the hunting down the animals, they can live a peaceful life. They will only be observed through glass windows of jeeps running through the safaries or in the aquariums. For instance, animal lovers in all over the world has been running a campaign to terminate the practice of whaling, which they consider a violation of animal rights.
Despite the aforementioned facts, only the animals which are classified as endangered should be protected. Every animal has their own predators and preys, except for the case of being on top of the food chain. Sheltering all of them will definitely make the already threatened ones disadvantaged, which will make their declining not prevented, but in contrast faster. Moreover, the species which threaten human life such as rats mostly exists in huge quantity, and therefore need to be regulated, not expand. Therefore, only the animals being on the brink of extinction needs to be concerned of protection.
In conclusion, it is nearly impossible to protect every species of animal, I believe that prerogative should only be given to those who are in danger of being extinct. Classification is needed to be done very carefully, in order to preserve our biodiversity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...consider a violation of animal rights. Despite the aforementioned facts, only t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, therefore, while, except for, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04697986577 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73368853669 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8605332841 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343235878213 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133116553424 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974714560909 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23128657112 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468599380633 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.