Some people believe the benefits of tourism outweigh the problems it creates in particular place. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

There is no doubt that, tourism industry is in its highest level in the world. There are several holidaymakers who tend to travel all the countries. Tourism has plethora of benefits for the countries with economic aspect and popularity which are outweighed by negative factors such as deterioration of culture in tourism countries and long term financial collapse.
On the one hand, having massive tourism facilities attract holidaymakers to the countries which depend on tourist contribution with money. However it has counterproductive issue like vanish of culture and inhabitants life style especially, who live in countryside. If governments have enhanced new technology industry by maintaining human resources, it would have led to greater advantage for their budget.
On the other hand, with regard to tourism, the main effort for some developing countries is to gain popularity in the world. In fact by investing huge money to the tourist destinations they lost money instead of gaining money over time by facilitating other types of industries. To take Azerbaijan as an example which appealed overseas people, by organizing some international games which desired to obtain influx of tourists. As a result government finance collapsed previous year after building facility for games and for tourists and it force inhabitants to live in substandard conditions. It would be great example for other countries, if their approach to the tourism has improved as some countries organized health or education tourism.
To sum up ,although tourism industry has numerous advantage which are fragile compare with its negative consequences, as well as exacerbating residents daily life or collapsing economy

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...end on tourist contribution with money. However it has counterproductive issue like van...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'forces'?
Suggestion: forces
...ility for games and for tourists and it force inhabitants to live in substandard cond...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... health or education tourism. To sum up ,although tourism industry has numerous a...
^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...has numerous advantage which are fragile compare with its negative consequences,...
^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tage which are fragile compare with its negative consequences, as well as exacer...
^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ences, as well as exacerbating residents daily life or collapsing economy ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, in fact, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up, with regard to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54961832061 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08373326886 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8575568226 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.166666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.087679698604 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335422012902 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366219345411 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0534481989092 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033241233291 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.