Development of the bicycle have been a breakthrough for modern society. Although some feel that usage of bicycle is a negative development, I, however, believe that it has a positive impact on our lives and environment for three reasons.
On the one hand, it could be argued that bikes and cycling itself is not always comfortable. Some people think that cycling is dependent on the weather, however, in many countries, with all four seasons, vast of population have learned how to cycle in any weather condition such as rain or snow. What is more, they also argue that most of bikes are expensive and can be easily stolen. I concede that newly producted bikes are made from fairly expensive materials and costly equipped, nevertheless, highly protective locks and GPS tracking are essential parts of new bikes.
However, I side with those who believe that bikes benefit our society . It is fact that cycling is a great way to excise, not only biker is working out, but he is also exposed to fresh air as most of biking is happening out of cities. Moreover, in my opinion, cycling is a great way how to reduce congestions and also in many cases the fastest way of transport. People who use a bike as a way how to commute are more punctual that their counterpart using car or public transport. Bike can be easily store in the office or locked on sidewalk, but car parks are mostly full and not able to cover a demand, also public transport, during the peak hours, facing almost every day significant delays. Perhaps the strongest argument outweighing drawbacks is that bikes are probably the most eco-friendly way of transport. Bike does not require any artificial source of energy as a result, it does not produce any exhausted fumes like a cars, diesel trains or planes. Furthermore, bikes tremendously reducing number of cars in cities, which leads not only to reducing traffic, but also to decrease of pollutions in already highly polluted areas. Take, Holland, for example. Netherlands are very well know as a country where vast of population using bikes as a way of transport most of the time, despite the weather or occasion. As a result, Holland is undoubtedly very well known as a country with the clearest air in Europe.
In short, although, its undeniable that cycling is in many cases weather dependent and bikes are expensive what attracts many criminals. Therefore, on balance, I believe that biking is not only the most eco-friendly way of transport, but also makes people healthier and its a good way how to commute.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the bikes') or simply say ''most bikes''.
Suggestion: most of the bikes; most bikes
...now. What is more, they also argue that most of bikes are expensive and can be easily stolen....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...o believe that bikes benefit our society . It is fact that cycling is a great way ...
^^
Line 5, column 1178, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...Take, Holland, for example. Netherlands are very well know as a country where vast ...
^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...rt, but also makes people healthier and its a good way how to commute.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, in short, such as, as a result, in many cases, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 435.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83908045977 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68773970907 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519540229885 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9691729264 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.789473684 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8947368421 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.89473684211 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.093690847626 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032813826719 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487258237719 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846563673346 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695423059247 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.