In contemporary times, traffic congestion is not only a burden but also a growing concern in every city all around the world. Therefore, some cities explore an alternative way of transportation system such as bicycles to reduce the pressure of vehicles on the road. Some people support this idea and others have a dissenting comment. In the following paragraphs, both views’ advantages and disadvantages will be discussed.
On the one hand, it is indisputable that cycling has huge benefits both environmentally and healthy. First of all, bicycles do not need any gasoline, therefore no burning fuel emits from the cycle, as a result, there was no chance to pollute the environment. Moreover, according to the physician, it is a good type of exercise to keep the body fit and it also boosts the immune system of the body. For example, research shows that people who do regular cycling less suffer from heart disease and high blood pressure. On the contrary, it has some difficulties, the seat is not comfortable for all, and no flexible suspension, as a consequence, a rider has to face more jerking and it causes back pain. Furthermore, in most of the city, there is no extra lane for the cycle, since there is a chance of an accident.
On the other hand, motor vehicles are more flexible and pleasant environment such as a highly comfortable seat with air-conditioning, in addition, it has an entertaining system which helps for smooth driving. Though it can give us flexibility and comfort, it has several issues such as it is costlier than the bicycle. Burning fuel causes more air pollution as a result of global warming increases and people have to face natural disasters like storms, floods, and so on. What's more, people have suffered from various diseases like asthma. According to the WHO, every year 4. 2 million people died from air pollution.
In conclusion, to sum up all the points above, it is clear that cycling has numerous advantages from both a health and environmental perspective than automobiles. So, in my opinion, people in the city should use cycles for their daily travel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...sasters like storms, floods, and so on. Whats more, people have suffered from various...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94647887324 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92357727901 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574647887324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2506923538 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174229495954 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529853940239 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512222681378 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117102605533 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794753361602 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.