Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than humans. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
It is true that whether positive or negative influences the expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) exerts on the lives of human beings is a subject of debate. While reasons can be given to justify the latter, the former is much more preferable.
On the one hand, there are reasonable grounds to think that machine intelligence creates some demerits of the world’s operation. First, artificial intelligence deprives humanity of critical thinking. It is an apparent fact that the more machines are applied, the less human beings strive to think and reason. As a result, people might take the computers for granted and become dependent upon machines. Second, machine intelligence is likely to reduce job opportunities for human due to its automatic systems. Artificial intelligence could replace the experience of people, and thus, considerably increase the unemployment rates. The job opportunities are anticipated to sharply plummet in the near future, including the jobs related to accounting, audit, or even law.
On the other hand, others would advocate that the ability of a digital computer to perform the tasks of intelligent beings results in more convenient lives for humanity. The first prominent justification is that artificial intelligence offers a multitude of innovations. It is acknowledged that machine learning, deep learnings, and other AI technologies bring about a huge amount of automation in manufacturing, which reduces human errors and inefficiency in different industries. Furthermore, without AI people have to participate in tedious tasks, including the dull duties in banking or finance, for instance. Needless to say, AI liberates humans and allows them to perform tasks in which they excel. This means that people would have more time to work on more creative and interpersonal aspects of their lives.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, although the world of artificial intelligence leads to the likelihood of computers’ manipulation, it seems to me that this technology significantly contributes to our lives in the long term.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.553125 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20448751509 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2333791989 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293541470596 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892249257905 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462654091918 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17037935556 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296320415701 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.