Students should pay the full cost for their own study because university education benefits individuals rather than society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that tuition fees should be covered by individual students in lieu of all the residents of the community. There are good arguments both for and against this view, but I believe it depends on different reasons.
I completely concur with the idea that the government should be culpable for the costs of education. The first prominent justification is that the subsidies for education incline to support significantly underprivileged students. As a matter of fact, not everyone has the capacity to afford all the costs of tuition, which means that without being supported, poor but aspiring students fail to approach academic doors. Only when education for low-income children is a matter of concern, the quality of the workforce will be driven up, and thus, lead to the improvement of productivity. Besides, the grant for education not only stimulates the ability of poor students yet also relieves the financial burden on parents. Consequently, they have more budget for medical and healthcare purposes for their children.
Nevertheless, I believe that subsidizing education causes a series of demerits. Firstly, the policy for supporting education decreases the budget for other vital sectors, including economics, environment as well as national defense. It is universally acknowledged that the budget is finite while the demands for all aspects are infinite. Furthermore, from the perspective of taxpayers, funding for education places a heavy burden on the residents who do not directly reap the benefits from education such as childless people. Last but not least, subsidies lead students to take their education for granted, which means that students are less likely to have the motivation to excel, and thus, not consider more lucrative investments rather than higher education.
In conclusion, while reasons can be given to justify that society should take responsibility for the costs of education, I believe these personal benefits should not impose the burden on the whole of the community.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, it is true, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41455696203 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98126628231 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9935405896 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.214285714 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2142857143 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254166432806 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845606746846 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340142194888 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146705583027 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044376365877 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.