Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills, such as cooperative skills. What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions?
It is true that some fundamental communication skills such as collaboration skills are lacking in recently established corporations. There are many reasons for this, but this situation should be addressed in some effective ways.
There are two primary reasons why a range of new firms are short of collaboration in the working environment. Firstly, in today's society, the young generation is reared up in the environment concentrating too much on academic performance rather than developing social skills. Secondly, new corporations have to survive in the harsh competitive environment which requires employees to rival others. Finally, the more society develops, the more skills the young have to learn. For example, the fourth industrial revolution is creating new techniques requiring a lot of time and efforts of the youngster rather than social skills.
There are several actions that businesses could take to solve the problem described above. The first solution is that they can hold team building courses for their staff to develop social development skills. It is true that team building plays a vital role in tightening the relationship between officers. The second solution is that newly established firms should reward equally for the right person since the wrong reward would cause employees to be resentful. Last but not least, schools should focus on training social development, especially the team spirit of students. For instance, more subjects on social skills should be organized in primary schools.
In conclusion, despite the fact that communication skills and other interpersonal skills are lacking in new corporations is detrimental to our working environment, some feasible measures can be taken to address the problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5447761194 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99439775421 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582089552239 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.192583958 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.142857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190676198913 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546079696805 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440985872176 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10985375023 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157398635444 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.