Some people believe that to give opportunities to the new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire.
Do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that high skilled workers with the age of 55 and above should be encouraged to the retiree for paving the way to the new generations in companies. I agree with the statement because of the current youth unemployment problem and companies’ technological innovation improvements.
There is no doubt that unemployment is one of the most pressing problems in many countries. This is because many fresh university graduates are struggling to find a job and entering the job market since all the corners have been taken by the elderly employees for a long time. For example, in most Turkish primary schools, the age average of the teachers is over 60 where this results with a huge problem among the new teacher-to-be candidates. However, If the senior lecturers could have left their placements to the young ones, the unemployment of young teachers would have been solved.
Moreover, as the technological developments change rapidly, companies need to update their progress of innovations constantly. This would only be possible if the corporations’ employee young brains. This is because the youth can easily adapt and meditate on the new technologies compared to the older generations. For instance, many Silicon Valley startups mainly hire people who are in their early twenties. On the other hand, If these companies only occupied high-level workers with lack of technology skills, they would have ended up being out of the market.
To conclude, corporations should end their contracts with the employees who is 55 and more. Because of the youth unemployment problem and being on the right track for companies in terms of innovations would only be possible with younger workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun Silicon seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much Silicon', 'a good deal of Silicon'.
Suggestion: much Silicon; a good deal of Silicon
...to the older generations. For instance, many Silicon Valley startups mainly hire people who ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23722627737 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94892543536 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56204379562 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3780567822 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.384615385 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162777374275 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615542385149 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637134456617 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118326313664 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730832555888 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.