Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are a number of people who think that building more train and subway facilities might decline the traffic jams, whereas other people say that it is better to build more and larger lanes on the road. In my opinion, although these two solutions have merits, I prefer constructing more train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestions because of several reasons.
Train and subway constructions should be spent more money on. First, this could reduce the number of people using private transports on the road. Because of having more seats and space, these two types of transportation could carry more people at the same time than cars and motorbikes. Second, building more trains and subways is easier than rebuilding wider roads. Take an example in Vietnam, where a variety of lanes are rebuilt to be larger, the citizens have to spend more time on the road since part of the road is under construction. Whereas trains and subways are built underground, or in an distinct area, it might be far away from the residential areas.
On the other hand, the money should be invested on having more and wider roads. Firstly, there will be more space for transportations during the traffic jams. With the same number of citizens using the construction, when operating a wider road, the rate of having traffic congestion would be reduced. Secondly, people could have more choices to go in order to prevent the traffic congestions. After having more roads reaching to the same destination, they would find a better way to travel to reduce the chance being stuck in a jam.
In conclusion, I think constructing more train and subway lines is more beneficial than building more roads. Having more streets is just a temporary solution, since this could encourage more citizens to own private transportations, which later cause a traffic congestion again.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 597, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...nd subways are built underground, or in an distinct area, it might be far away fro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, whereas, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99676375405 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66509128066 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501618122977 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8027112358 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380140849763 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144597947592 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744278113689 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27023367999 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861492683506 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.