The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems?
The wealth gap separating the rich and the poor is growing. This might lead to several effects on the countries’ economy and social security. However, once we understand the causes, solutions can be devised to counteract them.
There are some problems which are the result of this widening gap. First of all, the income inequality is closely linked to the economic crisis. People who are under the impoverish line cannot have as many opportunities in jobs and services as wealthy people. As a consequence, this might lead to the high rate of unemployment and poverty, and later could have a negative effect on the economic growth of the country. Second, without having enough money to provide their basic needs, poor people may turn to crime and steal other people’s property or sell drugs, which could give them enough money to live on.
Since these issues are serious, the government should have the responsibility to improve the lives of the poor and reduce the crime rate. First, they should invest in better education for poor people such as vocational training so as to help them find a stable job. The leaders can provide more scholarships for students who cannot afford the tuition fees to encourage them attend to higher education and gain higher positions. Second, the head of the country should tighten the security of the nation. They could reduce the taxes on low-income residents. In Vietnam, famiy that has an income lower than 10 million per month should not have to pay personal tax. Furthermore, strict laws should be enforced to prevent the poor from committing crimes.
In conclusion, an increase in crime rate and economic chaos is the consequence of the wide gap between the rich people and poor ones. However, there are still several actions for the government to take to reduce the bad effects caused by this gap.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e economic crisis. People who are under the impoverish line cannot have as many opportunities ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...poor people such as vocational training so as to help them find a stable job. The leader...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, may, second, so, still, as to, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93247588424 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52107257106 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575562700965 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6389551894 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2352941176 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236035696416 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718376949712 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779249876265 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156181856105 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068630754388 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.