Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There is a controversy of whether broadening streets or constructing train and subway lines would be a better idea to improve the issue of traffic congestion. While I agree that building more roads would work effectively in some nations, I still hold the view of constructing a newly-built transportation system under the ground.

Firstly, as developing nations still possess constraint budget, expanding streets would help these nations tackle this issue in the short term and at a quicker pace. By contrast, building a subway line would require a huge amount of money and a long period of time to complete these projects. For example, Vietnam has been constructing a train line for around 10 years, which still cannot come into the operation. This creates many disturbances and inconveniences for city dwellers and causes a waste of money for the nation. Secondly, widening roads is easier to apply in different countries stemming from far and wide and every background. This means, developing and poor nations do not need advanced and sophisticated techniques or construction materials to complete these projects.

However, I am inclined towards the idea of constructing train or subway lines. The initial reason is that these systems would not be intervened by tortuous roads on the ground, daily activities and transportation of citizens. This allows the construction process becoming easier and the later transportation system being smoother and quicker. As a result, employees and students do not need to wrestle with traffic jam on a daily basis, which helps to reduce commuting time and utilize it in other important purposes such as doing exercise or reading books in every early morning. For example, if there is the underground transportation system in my nation, I just need approximately 10 minutes to reach my university instead of spending more than one hour driving motorbike every day.

In conclusion, although each solution would have its own bright sides, I believe that train and subway lines would be more compatible with every nation in hectic life nowadays.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...quire a huge amount of money and a long period of time to complete these projects. For example...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26646706587 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94366196368 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577844311377 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9906239011 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.642857143 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156415667995 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530151001457 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465201077002 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105244843655 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461996977132 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...quire a huge amount of money and a long period of time to complete these projects. For example...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26646706587 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94366196368 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577844311377 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9906239011 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.642857143 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156415667995 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530151001457 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465201077002 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105244843655 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461996977132 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.