Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are different views about what is the best measure to solve traffic problems. While some people believe that money should be spent on the development of roads, I would argue that improving public transport is the best way to deal with traffic jam.
Firstly, allocate money to ameliorating trains and buses can deter people from using personal vehicles. By building more stops and improving the facilities of public transport, these means of transport will become more appealing to people and therefore shifting people's habits from driving cars to using trains and buses. For example, many of my friends said that they would love to commute by buses if the waiting time between to buses shorter.
Secondly, public transport is way more convenient and much cheaper than personal vehicles. Because trains do not have to go through intersections or traffic lights, while there are special lanes for buses so they are always on time and are the quickest way to traveling in city center. Moreover, public transport is capable of carrying many people all at once, which is much more efficient than individuals vehicles.
Lastly, the development of public transport also improve people's health and reduce environmental contamination. Some people might argue that spending money on the improvement of roads will solve traffic problems instantly. Howerver, more and wider roads will also encourage people to purchase personal vehicles, which leads to more traffic jams. Additionally, by changing people's commute habits, the amounts of polluted gases that are produced by cars will decrease, which results in a better living conditions.
In conclusion, I reaffirm my opinion that money should be allocated to the development of public transport rather than upgrading roads.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...ing the facilities of public transport, these means of transport will become more appealing...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36071428571 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.662702996 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546428571429 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7817440123 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.461538462 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239491883591 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882641749752 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532427860363 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129298843901 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538395544636 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.