Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is not uncommon to hear that people consider any activity as hobby only if it involves difficult activities and tasks. In my opinion, such views fail to understand the meaning of hobby and I cannot bring to agree with such arguments.
To start with, an activity qualifies to be a hobby if it entertains the participants of that activity. What it really means is any activity irrespective of its simplicity or complexity, would amount to hobby if people enjoy performing such activities, derive entertainment from such tricks. That’s why it is difficult to agree with such people who might think that hobbies need to involve complex activities.
Additionally, it is perfectly right to have very simple and ordinary hobbies such as running, or playing cards at home or playing computer games. In the case of computer games, many young people spend hours before computer and enjoy the activities thoroughly. There is hardly any element of hard labour in it. Therefore, this simple example clearly demonstrates that hobbies can range from simple to complex one.
Moreover, different people tend to enjoy different activities and there cannot be a single yardstick to determine the complexity of different tasks. As there are people of different abilities, no two people may agree about the complexity of a task. For example, many children may consider the performance of a clown in the circus to be difficult whereas in reality, the clown may have got used to repeating these activities so often that he may consider it to be extremely easy.
In conclusion, varieties of activities would qualify as hobby independent of their complexity. In reality, many of us are likely to understand and enjoy simple activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14539007092 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8984736222 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521276595745 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5721896889 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.642857143 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210582369055 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732786881871 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522467847339 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113302128606 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668062029004 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.