In this era of information and technology, sharing data in scientific research, business and the academic world freely is one of the most controversial issues that has raised many questions between proponents and opponents of this topic. The following paragraph will cast light on both these views in greater detail.
From one perspective, the former group contemplates that sharing as much information as possible with others help pave the way for counties to reach better medical experience and also grow their economy. It is believed that the disease could be hindered by new scientific research, hence people’s life would not be in danger because of hiding information. Not only that, but countries could be able to do business with new information better, so they economically could improve. Shortly, information must be shared without any limitation between all four corners of the world.
On the contrary, the latter group claims that sharing information always not be a good alternative. This group is of the opinion that maybe this valuable knowledge has used with a terrorist in a crucial way. Also, there is plenty of evidence to support the view that sometimes countries need to place importance on their information, one way is not good for all country. To put simply, it is obvious that sharing information always could not be a good resolution according to this group opinion.
To recapitulate from what has been argued above, although sometimes sharing data is ignored by some group because of the negative consequences it could have but I am personally inclined to agree with the former group in terms of preventing disease and help countries to grow economically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a crucial way" with adverb for "crucial"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ble knowledge has used with a terrorist in a crucial way. Also, there is plenty of evidence to s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd help countries to grow economically.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17518248175 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90114537156 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565693430657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.85402214 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.909090909 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309383357234 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113199824733 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509438607725 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166640153974 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677630866824 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.