Along all the last century, people discuss the possibility to share as much information as possible on a different level ( as scientific research, business and academic world) and determinate if this information exchange is right or not.
On the one hand, share information around the globe gives the possibility to all the people to establish their own opinion and study to expand their knowledge. Trough internet, that news could be sent in one instant in all the world and could be used as a base to discover new information and clarify as this other question humans have. This can also be used to learn from the past and try to not repeat the mistakes that have been made.
On the other hand, with the invention of the WEB, all the people can give their opinion and information on different websites. This can create a huge trap of fake news and because of the excessive quantity of these, it is not possible to certify which ones are true and which are not. At the same time, other information is too important to be share all around the world, as for example government secret or code used for military purpose.
In conclusion, I think is important to determinate the value of the information to share, because those can have at the same time a positive or negative influence on people. Is important to give more space to information that can increase people's knowledge or information that can help solve problems that affect our historical period, such as global warming. Moreover, it is also right to create more controls to reduce the expansion of fake news or delicate and secret information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmation as possible on a different level as scientific research, business and aca...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ret or code used for military purpose. In conclusion, I think is important to d...
^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...ue of the information to share, because those can have at the same time a positive or neg...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eriod, such as global warming. Moreover, it is also right to create more controls...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, as for, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78776978417 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65448372311 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.7224019349 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.1 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285800839709 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113251165622 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911788970873 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197474275349 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816787225621 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.