Earth natural resources are running out and, with the increase of population, there is no doubt that they will soon be entirely depleted. Scientists explain that unless more resources are found soon, the human race will face some insurmountable challenges. However, I believe that looking to space for a solution is the wrong answer.
Take fossil fuel as an example. This resource is running out and some scientists believe we could found a suitable replacement into space. They think we might found similar resources on some earth's nearest planets, like Mars or Venus. other suggest collecting this material causing little asteroids to explode, which are full of this kind of substance. But, is this a suitable solution?
Although at first glance this might seems a suitable solution, however, is not. First of all, space travels are extremely expensive and facing this kind of solution may not be cost-effective. Second, there is the economic impact would have in countries where the exports of fossil fuels are the main source of income, the short-term impact would be devastating. And as third, we are sure we want to increase the pollution on our planet? In my opinion, the best solution is to be able to allocate funds to carry forward the idea of developing renewable energy all around the globe. Replacing old factory machinery with new ones who create less pollution. Gradually replace plastic and other materials that are difficult to recycle, thus creating less waste. But above all, to reforest areas such as Amazonia because trees are perhaps the largest ecological "machine" of the entire planet.
In conclusion, looking to space for the answer is not the right answer. We need to be able to save our planet here and now. Start taking action and demonstrate that we care about our future, we have only one earth and even if there is the idea of terraforming a new planet, this cannot be a solution. Because if we destroying our planet now who can prove that in the future the human race will not do the same with the new one?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'earths the nearest'.
Suggestion: earths the nearest
...e might found similar resources on some earths nearest planets, like Mars or Venus. other sugg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
...hs nearest planets, like Mars or Venus. other suggest collecting this material causin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, third, thus, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9224137931 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67178184346 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577586206897 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8513174186 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.65 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278662055989 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799499962852 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714031276971 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170693419808 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539308614041 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.