At the present time, a consistent part of the population from different countries started to argue on the topic of funding and whether the government should allocate it. If in the expansion of the public transport network or on the high-speed train lines. My opinion is that this should be a consequence of each other.
In the first place, the state should decide to improve the already existent public transport to amplify the facilities, as a decrease in tickets price, discounts for students, workers and senior citizens. Increasing the daily and night rides. Another point to be made is to replace the existent "gasoline" transports with electric buses that are more environmentally friendly, thus reducing pollution. This increase in transport, would not only help to reduce the circulation of vehicles and therefore the creation of traffic but indeed, would create new working places, both as public employees and construction workers.
As a result, citizens will start to prefer the transportation provided from the state and as a consequence the government should spend more money on the construction of high-speed rail lines, allowing a faster journey between different cities. This expansion can create over other jobs, a faster sales plan that permits the transportation of utilities and object between cities in a shorter period. Improving like this, the economy of the country.
In conclusion, the government must start from the "small", creating more efficient inner-cities transport and than concentrate on the national expansion of the fast-train railway lines, reaching in the nearly future an organized environment focused on technology and economic progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...re efficient inner-cities transport and than concentrate on the national expansion o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54022988506 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18114739855 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605363984674 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.5134730029 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.454545455 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222515097123 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752989669752 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439970255971 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121208905229 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386275612921 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.