Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is always a common debate of whether people should share as much information as their capability. Many individuals claim that this trend may have a positive impact. Meanwhile, others believe that various data is significantly essential and valuable not to be published widely.
Although it is hard to decide which view is more valid, I am of the idea that some such important information in science, business and academic world should not be shared popularly.
Numerous people say that sharing information as much as possible is beneficial. There is an usual belief that it will provide a wide range of knowledge in various aspects of lives. By doing this, people will become more knowledgeable and tend to succeed flawlessly. Moreover, many people argue that publicising data in scientific fields can give authorities a large number of solutions to recently problematic issues. Air pollution, for instance, has been gradually reduced in geographical range and danger scale due to experiments measuring plenty of air contaminants.
In contrast, I strongly hold the belief that some data or statistics are just too essential and worth to be shared to the public. In the globalization process, some critical information is the key factor to the business success. For example, a restaurant will be less likely to compete with others in sales as well as income because of their publication of secret ingredients and experiences making them an unique franchise. In addition, sharing some important information can affect the whole country leading to serious consequences. This is primarily because much data contains national secrets and security passwords. As a result, hackers may find clues and break down the firewall in the national and global system.
In conclusion, while many people claim that sharing information in scientific research, business and academic world brings back benefits, I strongly oppose that point of view because some data is too essential to be published widely. From my perspective, individuals and governments should consider carefully before publicising to the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...uch as possible is beneficial. There is an usual belief that it will provide a wid...
^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... scientific fields can give authorities a large number of solutions to recently problematic issue...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 404, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ingredients and experiences making them an unique franchise. In addition, sharing ...
^^
Line 4, column 561, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...consequences. This is primarily because much data contains national secrets and sec...
^^^^
Line 4, column 565, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...equences. This is primarily because much data contains national secrets and secur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38484848485 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97439486171 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1229016479 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.529411765 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400791465241 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111337439908 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107894807601 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217972825267 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613499777713 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.