Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible
in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that
some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Thanks to technological progress, information plays a more important role than it used to be in modern times. Some said that information should be share as much as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Nevertheless, others think that some information can not be shared freely since it is too important or too valuable. In my opinion, society can be benifited by sharing information in different fields. However, if we share some important information, it will cause troubles to our society.
For starters, sharing information can benefit our society in many ways. First of all, people can combine the information from different fields and create new way to apply. For instance, scientists can use environment data and agriculture data to predict the food price, so that government can apply some policies to mitigate poverty and famine issues. Moreover, researchers can work more efficiently due to sharing information. They do not need to do the same research to get the data, since these are public information. If the information can be share to public, it can benefit our society and make it be more efficient.
However, some important information should not be shared to public. It may hurt the particular organize or individual, if their important information are shared. For example, if a restaurant's special recipe is shared to public, its competitors will copy it. So that, these restaurant will lose feature. In the result, no restaurants want to develop new recipe. This phenomenon can also happen in other fields, not just happen in restaurants. As the result, If we share all information, even include the too valuable one, it will make our society has no motivate to create something new.
In conclusion, sharing information can make our society more efficient. However, it can reduce innovation, if we share the important or too valuable information to public.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shared'?
Suggestion: shared
...s. Some said that information should be share as much as possible in scientific resea...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ety and make it be more efficient. However, some important information shou...
^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a restaurant' or simply 'restaurants'?
Suggestion: a restaurant; restaurants
...information are shared. For example, if a restaurants special recipe is shared to public, its...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this restaurant' or 'these restaurants'?
Suggestion: this restaurant; these restaurants
... its competitors will copy it. So that, these restaurant will lose feature. In the result, no re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22402597403 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99451873186 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512987012987 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 2.10420841683 475% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6065448845 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.45 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370342505705 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136098487626 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124312291728 0.0667982634062 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267447088569 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13080976044 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shared'?
Suggestion: shared
...s. Some said that information should be share as much as possible in scientific resea...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ety and make it be more efficient. However, some important information shou...
^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a restaurant' or simply 'restaurants'?
Suggestion: a restaurant; restaurants
...information are shared. For example, if a restaurants special recipe is shared to public, its...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this restaurant' or 'these restaurants'?
Suggestion: this restaurant; these restaurants
... its competitors will copy it. So that, these restaurant will lose feature. In the result, no re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22402597403 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99451873186 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512987012987 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 2.10420841683 475% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6065448845 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.45 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370342505705 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136098487626 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124312291728 0.0667982634062 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267447088569 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13080976044 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.