Knowledge exchange gain enormous popularity among those who work on science, economy, and academy. In my perspective, despite several benefits of information sharing, the secret, deleterious and influential information should be rigorously selected before openly shared.
On the one hand, it is no doubt that useful information is meant to be shared with everyone for the society’s benefit. People deserve to learn new things, discover emerging phenomenon and adapt it to their daily life. Results and initiatives in laboratories should be transferred and applied to the public at large scale to benefit civilian. In research and academy areas, updating knowledge from peers would help individuals save time on making mistake and doing research on a wrong path. Moreover, a research fellow can build the new research based on the literature review and avoid duplicating work. Useful knowledge of health could save many people from diseases and make their life better.
On the other hand, there is secret information related to politics, deleterious sectors should not be freely published. In the case of business sector, sharing information is potentially harmful the company’s competitive advantage. For example, a well-known restaurant is better to keep its secret recipes to guarantee its profit. In research of sensitive sectors such as toxic or explosive materials, a free share of information might reach the wrong user, which leads to bad results.
In conclusion, despite the existence of some opinions in favour of knowledge publicity of scientist, entrepreneur, and academia. I do believe that information should be carefully shared for the sake of both the giver and the receiver.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53435114504 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00978339876 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637404580153 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.6003431435 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.571428571 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237253945072 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746461969273 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612209120913 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140052957162 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456089574926 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.