Some people believe that modern designs for schools and offices with more open spaces are necessary. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such spaces?
Some people believe that modern designs for schools and offices with more open spaces are necessary because they believe that these types of environments are more conducive to creativity and productivity. Others believe that open spaces are more appealing to students and employees, and that these spaces are more conducive to communication and collaboration.
On one hand, the open spaces can encourage collaboration and communication between staff and students. They can create a sense of community and open up more opportunities for interaction. Open spaces may also be more visually appealing, with natural light and views of the outdoors. For instance, if a healthy environment is maintained inside the offices or rooms, air can easily pass through. As a result, it is critical to preserve space when constructing structures.
On other hand, open spaces can be noisy and distracting, making it difficult to concentrate. They may not provide enough privacy for confidential conversations. They can also be difficult to control temperature and humidity and may not be suitable for certain types of work. It is extremely difficult to perform sanitation on a daily basis if the room is larger than normal. If the space inside the rooms is increased, additional funds must be invested.
There are many reasons why people believe that modern designs for schools and offices with more open spaces are necessary. One reason is that people feel that they need more space to relax and focus in a closed environment. Open spaces also promote creativity and collaboration, which are important aspects of work. Additionally, open spaces allow for natural light and ventilation, which can improve the air quality and reduce the risk of illnesses.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29241877256 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99564167945 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501805054152 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9734149543 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46570106375 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163583909546 0.084324248473 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15835271852 0.0667982634062 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320804795017 0.151304729494 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164541786103 0.056905535591 289% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.