Some people believe that Olympic games are beneficial for the host nation. However, others think that these create many problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Olympic games play a magnificent role to uplift the standard of health, wealth and relationship. Presently, some proportion of masses consider that organizing Olympic events is supposed to be lucrative for the host nation in terms of reputation, financial and social matters. By contrast, others believe that Olympic games are worthless to be organized in a country. This essay intends to account for both views with my own perspective.
There are multifarious points to support theformer view. First and foremost, arranging international sports like Olympic games allows many talented players to earn name, fame along with money at international platform.To be specific, players, nowadays are passionate to take part in such events to make the world record by revealing their exceptional talent and get their names published in the Guinness book of records in order to get popularity worldwide. Players not only glorify their families and countries status but also earn an insane amount of money. As a result, the role of Olympic games is phenomenal for players to lead prosperous lifestyle. What is more, organizing sports events internationally could be lucrative to create plethora of job opportunities. For example, a massive number of people from the different part of global visit to the host nation while arranging Olympic events. In this way, many taxi drivers, tour guide and workers get jobs in hotel and restaurants and they can earn back and belly.Hence, the idea of managing such games deserves appreciation and it is worthwhile for the individuals of host nations.Besides this, bridging cultural gap among nations is the result of organizing international sports events likeOlympic games. To illustrate, players and tourists exchange their thoughts, ideas and feelings with locals during Olympic events. Thus, it could be fruitful to promote global friendship as well harmonious bonding.
Multifarious points can be taken to endorse the latter view. Initially, organizing Olympic events not only requires an astronomical outlay but also consuming natural resources exuberantly while managing playgrounds, roads and hotels for tourists. Therefore, such events are trivial according to some masses. In addition, these are also responsible to rise air and noise contaminations while using transportation for reaching playground. Consequently, the demerits of organizing Olympic games are very clear also.
To recapitulate, sports have become part and parcel for every nation in 21st century. Undeniably, Olympic games bring few drawbacks for environment and mankind. However, In my opinion, the importance of such games cannot be underestimated. Consequently, international sports events like Olympic have vital role in the holistic development of host country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...ng with money at international platform.To be specific, players, nowadays are pass...
^^
Line 3, column 1024, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...urants and they can earn back and belly.Hence, the idea of managing such games deserv...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Besides
...ile for the individuals of host nations.Besides this, bridging cultural gap among natio...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n astronomical outlay but also consuming natural resources exuberantly while mana...
^^
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...organizing Olympic games are very clear also. To recapitulate, sports have becom...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63095238095 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09400250063 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564285714286 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.007994096 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31818181818 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245910059013 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736071976919 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453006099076 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161752240688 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477401376824 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.