Some people believe the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between poor people and rich people. Others think it is having an opposite effect. Discuss these points of views. What is your opinion?
Nowadays information technology is becoming an essential part of modern life. People of different welfare level face some pieces of this technology every day. But do this mean that the gap between rich and poor is getting smaller? In my mind, it is not really correct to answer this question just positively. Information technology is a power of modernity that affects the society both ways giving to poor and rich the same opportunities to develop and working for those who can pay more.
There is no doubt that with the spread of the Internet people in almost every corner in the world, of any age and wealth got the access to a vast amount of information. This means that one can learn new things, read any books, study any languages just with a help of a gadget with Internet access. Using these data people can improve their professional skills or get some new. Therefore, their competence increases, and they are getting more competitive workers with a higher salary rates.
On the contrary, information technology has become a business, whose owners are the richest people in the world. «Who owns the information, he owns the world» — this famous words by Nathan Rothschild seem to be true nowadays. Moreover, information technology companies can manipulate with data, solving what one should or should not know. This all multiplies the power in the hands of rich, who decide what will happen to others.
Summing up, information technologies allows people to raise their social and economic status, but at the same time became a new tool for rich people to maintain their position in modern society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, no doubt, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96323529412 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61210583358 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0674456053 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4285714286 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17009621034 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063083094568 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493335876768 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105882238922 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036961311007 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.