Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that reading book is more beneficial for children compared to watching TV or playing computer games. Personally, I completely agree with this statement and analyze my point of view in the essay.
First of all, children can better improve their imagination through reading books in comparison with watching TV or playing computer games. By reading books, they have to use their imagination to create a vision and visualize all events which are described by words in books. While reading books, they will create images, thoughts and opinions in their mind. These enhance their imagination and creativity. Meanwhile, this can hardly happen for watching TV as TV provides full images and vibrant colours. Consequently, it is reasonable to say that reading books help children produce more imaginative responses than watching TV.
Finally, reading stories from a book also develop their verbal abilities compared to watching TV or playing computer games. Children will be exposed a wide range of vocabularies as well as sentence structures when reading books. In additional, reading books can provide great opportunities for children to increase their vocabulary level which can lead to better writing skills. Meanwhile, when it comes to TV or computer games, sounds and pictures are two main elements rather than texts. So, books are better than TV or computer games at improving children’s vocabulary.
In conclusion, I completely agree that reading stories in a book is better than watching TV or playing computer game. Because reading book helps children enhance their imagination and advance vocabulary level.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41960784314 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75863329751 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3923873106 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.1333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440094321082 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173006354034 0.084324248473 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147989164392 0.0667982634062 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326319344173 0.151304729494 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663884030562 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.