Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV and playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people indeed argue that youngsters should concentrate on enjoying books rather than playing or using electronic devices. I completely agree with this argument.
On the one hand, there are negative aspects of the habits of watching TV or playing computer games which many youngsters develop as they grow up. The first reason for this is their mental and physical health. Kids tend to sit in front of the television, turn on their favorite programs, and spend hours enjoying them. That is a reason for the level of children who have an impact on heart disease and vision problems. Another reason is interaction skills, which are requirements, are limited. It is impossible if they only keep looking at the screen that occupies all their attention.
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why I also believe reading books is the best measure to improve mental and knowledge. Firstly, it is the nature of children to explore and discover, so expanding their knowledge through reading books is the best way. For instance, during summer vacations, parents can let their kids participate in book clubs, and youngsters are encouraged to prepare and tell their peers what they learn from this book. In addition, books stimulate the brain and keep it active, which allows it to retain its power and capacity. Reading gives it regular exercise and keeps it healthy and sound, so children need to improve and hold on to it.
In conclusion, for both positive and negative reasons, I would argue that it is better for children to read stories from a book than to waste time watching TV or playing video games.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 676, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dren need to improve and hold on to it. In conclusion, for both positive and neg...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87636363636 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50685011931 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1069997453 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301882388844 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844094813393 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08698773937 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188931462295 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095836767006 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.