Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much; we should demolish them and build new ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
According to research, in today’s world 90% of the buildings and houses are more than thirty years old. Gradually, as years pass-by, these buildings tend to suffer damages. Gradually, as years pass-by, these buildings tend to suffer damages. Therefore, it’s a popular opinion to de-construct and rebuild to save a lot of money; however, there are few buildings which need not undergo this process. This essay will discuss few points in agreement, as well as disagreement of this view.
To begin with, India is one of the most populated countries and having old infrastructure is not viable during natural calamities. Restoring these buildings by fixing the affected areas is dangerous. Researchers point out the risks involved in restoration, as these buildings tend to collapse during earthquakes, harming many around the area. Thus, demolishing them and rebuilding them is the only option.
On the flip side, there are few buildings which represent the country's culture and heritage. For example, the Taj Mahal which is the popular monument of India, represents value to the country by encouraging tourism. It is said that each year, thousands of people fly to Agra to have a glance at this piece of art. Huge amounts are invested in the maintenance of such treasures. Demolishing this monument would lower the economy of the country, as well as the historical value involved. Hence, it might be wise to restore such buildings.
Having analysed the above point of views, it is sufficed to say that, regular old buildings can be demolished for reconstruction but this does not apply for buildings which carry a lot of value, not only for itself, but also for the country. Restoring such worth building might be a wise decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-05 | raghibah | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-21 | santhip123 | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-21 | santhip123 | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-21 | santhip123 | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-21 | santhip123 | 73 | view |
- Producing clean energy is an impossible goal Instead we need to focus on reducing energy consumption How far do you agree with this statement Support your views with justification and examples 78
- Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11228070175 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79636135207 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568421052632 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6659334264 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7058823529 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183678882305 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617172035848 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411772545006 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115472056724 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361332451704 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.