Producing clean energy is an impossible goal. Instead, we need to focus on reducing
energy consumption.'
How far do you agree with this statement? Support your views with justification and examples.
In today's fast moving world, everything is completely driven by energy. From large scale industries to small scale factories,
from automobiles sectors to house hold electrical appliances, from spaceship to underwater research - all driven by energy. Considering the rapid growth in technological advancements, the role of energy occupies the most prominent position in deciding the growth of global economy. It is true that producing clean energy is an impossible goal. Instead, we need to focus on reducing energy consumption. Below paragraphs describes about that.
It should be noted that we can generate energy by various sources such as setting up of windmills, setting up of hydroelectric plants and setting large thermal and nuclear power stations. All these are varied sources by which we can generate energy and by which we satisfy our daily needs to some extent. But it also should be noted that the population rate is also surprisingly increasing at a drastic scale and the daily needs of the people is also steadily increasing. Having said that, energy saving is really need of the hour. By saving energy, we not only makes our life easier but also provides the path to the future generation to live peacefully in the planet.
One of the main factors for wastage of energy is mainly due to negligence. People should realise the importance of energy.
The proper usage of energy should be educated right from the childhood itself. For example, even at homes we use electrical items such as Fans, lights for our daily needs and sometimes forget to switch it off back after the usage.
It is now encouraging to see, many of us are now started adhering to "Go-Green" style of living. The idea of generating energy from unwanted items is now in full swing. We have now proper mechanism for recycling of old items. Many countries encourages to use solar panels both at homes and also at commercial areas. These are all some of the positive signs to look far.
In conclusion, we all love our mother nature and by saving energy we make our live more eco friendly. Alone we can do a little and together we can do so much. So, let's start use energy diligently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 515, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...ving said that, energy saving is really need of the hour. By saving energy, we not o...
^^^^
Line 9, column 23, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seeing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: seeing
...ter the usage. It is now encouraging to see, many of us are now started adhering to...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'encourage'.
Suggestion: encourage
... recycling of old items. Many countries encourages to use solar panels both at homes and a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 263, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...of old items. Many countries encourages to use solar panels both at homes and also at ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 341, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...also at commercial areas. These are all some of the positive signs to look far. In concl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, really, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92682926829 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75322508278 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2539631981 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0434782609 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0434782609 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86956521739 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.67935871743 219% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206489662663 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698317381595 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913733682711 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927494126964 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729979633726 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.