While wearing uniforms is a mandatory requirement for students in some high schools, others allow their students to wear casual clothes at school. From my perspective, I partially agree with the idea of school uniforms for the following reasons.
On the one hand, I believe that a uniform can benefit the highschool as well as their students. Firstly, a uniform can define the school’s identity. In Vietnam, for example, the majority of highschools have their own uniforms, which vary in colors, designs and unique logos. This may bring the students a sense of unity and be helpful in identifying them at events where many highschools gather. Secondly, wearing uniforms can alleviate possible class discrimination in high schools. As students come from different socio-economic backgrounds, fancy clothes are something to flaunt their wealth and privilege. Hence, wearing similar outfits seems to be a feasible solution for this distinction, increasing students' concentration on their academic performances.
On the other hand, I suggest that a highschool uniform might negatively impact some groups of people, and one of them could be the low-income families. To illustrate, the average cost of a standard uniform set for Vietnamese highschool students is 500 thousands Vietnamese dong, which constitutes a considerable budget of impoverished households. This might place a heavy financial burden on them when they have to pay this extra money almost every academic year. Moreover, wearing uniforms can be uncomfortable for students suffering from obesity. To be more specific, uniforms in standard sizes which do not fit these students seem to restrict their movement, so that wearers must seriously consider how they sit and run. This can bring obese students insecurity and even contribute to bullying in high schools.
In conclusion, it is my belief that compulsory uniforms are important for highschool students, however, it should be made affordable and comfortable for all students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...lution for this distinction, increasing students concentration on their academic perform...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 746, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... they sit and run. This can bring obese students insecurity and even contribute to bully...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02722091249 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584415584416 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.861014297 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278011829604 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972366982446 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619285129413 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186645965798 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454220278647 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.