Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction today. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the ear of advanced technology, the issue of whether smartphones bring more benefits than drawbacks has been a topic of discussion for many years. While some people believe that using mobile phones exerts a negative impact on social interaction, this essay will argue that the innovation of phones has significantly bettered people’s social life.
The various resources that mobile phones have brought to socialization enable users to expand their social circle. In the past, people used to have limited options to meet with others, whereas there are various methods to know and make friends with common grounds with the assistance of different applications on phones. For instance, the young generation now is more likely to start friendships via social media, such as Facebook, Instagram and WeChat, chatting online without stepping out. In this case, having a smartphone helps them to start their social interaction. This is not the only benefit coming with smartphones.
Another advantage of the widespread usage of smartphones is that the quality of interaction has been improved dramatically. This gives people opportunities to communicate remotely through not only the texts, but photos, voice and videos sharing with each other instantly. To be more specific, family and friends who are living overseas highly depend on video conferences to keep in touch and maintain relationships during the COVID pandemic when international travelling is suspended in Australia. Thus, the smartphone is indispensable for people’s daily interaction.
In conclusion, this essay has argued that phones produce a positive, rather than detrimental impact on social interaction because it provides platforms to build and keep relationships. Globally, people will have a better social life with more sophisticated innovations of technology.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64748201439 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01032503716 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622302158273 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2894296611 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.769230769 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172025282384 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639310715708 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485027761596 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11148115695 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310149418623 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.