some people believe that software programming should be tacht at primary school.
others think that the focus at this level should be on playing
both views, opinion
Nowadays almost every curriculum is differ through various countries at educational institutions. While many people believe that it is better to include studying computer technology at elementary schools, others tend to think that the most important focus should be given to playing. This essay will discuss why teaching software programming has its benefits at such level, but why playing for young pupils is ultimately superior.
Teaching children significant skills for software developing is certainly an efficient way to increase their knowledge. Students will receive the ability to think critical and be aware of more things, which may even has an influence on their future career choise. To give an example, while some pupils at primary academies in Ukraine have already been studying informatics for many years and are now broad-minded, those, who did not gain such knowledge earlier face more difficulties in learing mathematics and other sciences. Overall, by learning such subject at the earliest years can definitely make one more intelligent and broad-minded in the future.
Meanwhile, focusing on playing at this level is favoured by also many people, because it will gain children more essential skills for their current ages. If one did not receive important the simplest soft skills and did not understand how to communicate and behave with others, in the future there would be a possibility that he will be an introvert and self-enclosed or even an aggressive person. This is why it is one of the most important thing that both teachers and parents should do - encourage young generation to play with each other. For instance, new project in Ukraine not only force all primary schools teach simple three R's, but also the government provided with various playgrounds and toys to educational facilities. Therefore, it goes without saying, that this type of studying gives more essential abilities for students.
To sum up, in our fast paced world there are more and more diverse subjects which are enclosed to curriculums. This essay discussed why studying at primary educational facilities software programming can be an extremely efficient way of increasing the overall knowledge, but why focusing on playing is an essential level in developing soft skills. In my point of view, various plays with other children at this level offer superior benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'differed'.
Suggestion: differed
Nowadays almost every curriculum is differ through various countries at educationa...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or young pupils is ultimately superior. Teaching children significant skills for...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 657, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lligent and broad-minded in the future. Meanwhile, focusing on playing at this l...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 840, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more essential abilities for students. To sum up, in our fast paced world there...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 169, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facilities'' or 'facility's'?
Suggestion: facilities'; facility's
...sed why studying at primary educational facilities software programming can be an extremel...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35106382979 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80875681009 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566489361702 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.7255367182 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.133333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272013066656 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885201420865 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677911357253 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187060621932 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716081036618 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.