The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors' contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the comparison of two sexes with obesity in Australia over the period from 1980 to 2010 in terms of percentage.
Overall, the number of men do no overweight women by a significant margin. While both modes were relatively similar between the sexes, there was some variance, especially in male with huge weight percentage, when it decreased throughout the period between 2000 and the next decade. Evidently, the proportion of women has been increasing and almost reaching the same proportion of fat men, as this tendency decreased in the second sex, which was mentioned.
With regards to female fraction who faced the obesity, the general level greatly increased by approximately 15% from 30 to 45% in year 1990 and after the slight rise in the next decade it has been remained relatively stable by the year 2010.
The percentage of fat males in Australia fluctuated over the period, however, the trajectory was more consistent rising sharply in the fist three decades from 40 to 65%, by 25%; meanwhile, the last part of the period has seen the gentle decline by 5% to 60%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98387096774 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68070468213 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7182854783 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.5 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0393137949974 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0205299055166 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297061725189 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0289747321444 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324928934358 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.