Some people believe that students in school learn better when they study in groups, whereas others believe students learn better when they study on their own. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this contemporary society, school-related issues have been claimed to bring about a controversial debataion. One of the foremost conflicts is the method which students adapt to absorb knowledge. While many people consider that teenagers should spend time learning in groups, the others appreciate the method of studying alone more. Personally, although both viewpoints involve many advantageous aspects, my firm conviction is that cooperation in learning is more effective.
On the other hand, I understand why many people of the fervent conviction incline to study independently. One of the most obvious merits is that kids can acquire more knowledge. In addition, a student who decides to learn alone can start his or her lesson immediately without waiting for friends. Hence, such a control in study schedule may help children to not only feel more comfortable but also attain higher amount of academic information.Moreover, through learning individually, youngsters are able to concentrate more on their subjects. Additionally, it is noisy group discussion that many kids are distracted.This problem may result in the lack of consciousness and low-quality performance in studying.
Despite the reasons described above, I still believe such a collaboration in learning positively boosts the progress of children. Firstly, students have better understanding of what they are studying. The more the people involve in one school’s group, the more perspectives about certain issue the team obtains. For instance, in group studying, one Math’s problem may have various methods to solve . Consequently, students have more opportunities to gain knowledge in a thorough way, broadening their horizon on a great scale. Secondly, an environment which requires collaboration in learning helps adolescents to get accustomed to the workplace in the future. Nowadays, almost occupations require teamwork. If kids fail to adapt to this competitive condition, they may face with higher rate of unemployment. Therefore, being familiar to teamwork in early ages can significantly make this transition more straightforward and less stressful.
Taking everything into consideration, although independent learning contributes many advantages related to concentration or efficiency, such a method of cooperation provides better opportunities, especially in terms of future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng for friends. Hence, such a control in study schedule may help children to not ...
^^
Line 4, column 445, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...n higher amount of academic information.Moreover, through learning individually, youngst...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 618, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...iscussion that many kids are distracted.This problem may result in the lack of consc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...roblem may have various methods to solve . Consequently, students have more opport...
^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a thorough way" with adverb for "thorough"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ve more opportunities to gain knowledge in a thorough way, broadening their horizon on a great sc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85549132948 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42220203244 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624277456647 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8336799946 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.631578947 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2105263158 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227133830493 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627057222895 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476429872099 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12832659792 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034762597573 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.