It is often argued by some that in order to raise the standard of education, evaluation and criticism of teachers by their students should be allowed, whereas some think that it would be disrespectful to teachers. In my opinion, I agree with the former view and think that criticism of teachers by their students is not disrespectful and would result in raising the standard of education.
On the one hand, some believe that criticism and evaluation of teachers by their students will raise the standard of education because it will make teachers more responsible. They would be prepared to face questions from boys and girls in schools, and would therefore, prepare their lectures properly, resulting in better quality of teaching. For instance, according to a recent online poll conducted by the Department of State Education in 2015 in Uganda, revealed that schools were students were encouraged to question and engage in open discussions with teachers have shown a better annual pass percentage than schools that did not followed this practice. I completely agree with this view and think that such type of practice in schools would improve the standard of education, as teachers will act more responsibly.
On the other hand, some claim that such type of behavior by students would be disrespectful to teaching staff, as their ego may get hurt. This is to say that they will feel comfortable when someone questions their ability, resulting in degradation in the quality of education. For example, according to an article published by The Arab Times in 2016 revealed that in many schools across Middle Eastern region, students were not encouraged to question their teachers, as it was considered to be disrespectful to teachers. However, I do not agree with this and think that questioning teachers does not result in being disrespectful and instead would result in increasing the knowledge of teachers.
In conclusion, although some think that evaluation and criticism of teachers by students could be disrespectful as their ego might be hurt, it is better to criticize and evaluate teachers because this would make teachers more responsible and therefore, raise the stand of education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , some
...tandard of education. On the one hand,some believe that criticism and evaluation o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 822, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as teachers will act more responsibly. On the other hand, some claim that such ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...herefore, raise the stand of education.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, may, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21875 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88953694342 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434659090909 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6575912357 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.0 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345336522883 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153986320131 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781890482168 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252597425637 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605520162341 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.