Some people believe that students should study in groups. Others think that they should study alone. What are the benefits of studying in groups and studying alone? Which way is more effective?
It is noticeable that recent decades witnessed the upwards pattern in self-learning, raising many questions of its substantial impacts on students’ academic achievements. Although the benefits of studying in groups could be pronounced, I think studying alone is more effective.
On the one hand, there are many advantages when it comes to studying in groups. First, studying in groups is invariably associated with the higher degree of interaction and consultation with other peers. This could act as an incentive for students’ deeper understanding of the lessons, contributing to their making progress. Second, studying in groups means that students could freely share reference learning materials with others, incentivising studying effectiveness. In fact, learning foreign languages together correlates with the acquisitions of documents pertaining to enhancing pronunciation or writing skills, acting as a catalyst for their language proficiency.
On the other hand, it should be acknowledged that autonomous learning could bestow many considerable benefits. First, self-studying could be conducive to the higher level of concentration on academic tasks due to no distractions stemming from friends like group studying. In addition, autonomous learning students could freely acquire knowledge from alternative resources such as cloud courses rather than their dependence on friends in group learning, thereby feeding into their increased academic attainments.
In conclusion, autonomous learning could guarantee the efficiency and the increase in academic achievements more than group studying. However, students could take their potential academic capacity and learning needs into consideration to adhere to the most practical methods for their long-term development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.176 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26949537391 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6562487281 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246984261562 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10994945795 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117031604356 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158605693634 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879128183103 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.56 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.