Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child's development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion.
It is often argued by some people that home-schooling exerts the most positive impacts upon children’s development while others believe that it is of great importance for youngsters to go to school. In my opinion, I am of favor with the later viewpoint.
On the one hand, educating children at home can bring them certain values. Firstly, they can learn whatever they want regardless of family backgrounds as well as geological and climatic adversities. Secondly, parents have the ability to respond to what their offspring need and how they learn best. Therefore, they are likely to change their teaching methodologies, which thereby leading to fruitful results. Finally, adolescents can study at own pace in order to achieve better understanding of each lesson.
On the other hand, I strongly reckon that conventional schools are the best for a child’s development for a variety of reasons. The first cause would be that schools shape students’ characteristics due to their rules. For instance, children will enhance their disciplines because they are forced to go to school on time, not cheat during exams, not talk during classes. Furthermore, only traditional schools can create an effective studying environment for learners to develop skills which will play a fundamental part in their future career. To illustrate, cooperation with good students for a long time will result in a development in scholastic competitiveness. Moreover, they can improve their speaking skills when dealing with Power Point spoken presentations.
In conclusion, I think teenagers should study at schools as their pros far outweigh home-schooling’s benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rstly, they can learn whatever they want regardless of family backgrounds as well...
^^^
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to best', 'to well'
Suggestion: to best; to well
...their offspring need and how they learn best. Therefore, they are likely to change t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.515625 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30360687119 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671875 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0586958591 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.857142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5714285714 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305185742099 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959409186914 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102152864588 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188661833881 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998414884858 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.