It is opined by the majority of people that adults should require for the society work in their spare time without money. It can be efficient for the community as well as for teens. I disagree with this notion and in this essay I will highlight the valid reasons to substantiate the same.
Commencing with the views of agreement that it is the good lesson for teenagers. To explain it, there are numerous teens who are not know about the community works and how it will be beneficial for them. As a result, it is the best opportunity for them to do work as well as they do for their internal happiness and satisfaction.
Shifting the views with disagreement that they should be paid. To explicate it, nowadays the majority of adults are living far away from their homes and to fulfill their needs they should be earned a tiny amount of money. To epitome, a survey was conducted by Mumbai University in 2019 has revealed that 80% of adults put step forward in society works. Therefore, it is a good idea to pay their teenagers for community works.
Further, strengthening the views, nowadays most of the adolescents only spending their leisure time on social media which affects on their health as well as they do wrong works. To exemplify, it had been written in the newspaper that, 50% children were suffering from eyes problems and body ache. Thus, if community pay to them for their work then they can utilize their time in good things.
To recapitulate, I strongly believe it is duty of teenagers to do volunteer in community work. However, community should pay for their work to save from doing wrong things and motivate them to earn money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...t, there are numerous teens who are not know about the community works and how it wi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as for, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69759450172 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54905926662 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518900343643 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1348547358 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437715549612 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151783392499 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993605734395 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258450604131 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758818782979 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.