The given tabular graph illustrates the information regarding the proportion of usage four various fuel kinds to made electricity in five Asian nations in 2005.
Overall, it can be seen that, all the Asian countries use the highest other kind of fuel to generate the electricity. Whereas, the least percentage of petroleum was used to generate electricity.
It is crystal clear that, in Malaysia, the highest percentage of coal and lignite fuel was used to produce electricity which was 67%. While, the proportion of all the other type of fuel was under 20%. However, the same pattern was followed in the Singapore where 42% of coal and lignite and 10% of the other kind of fuel was used to prepare electricity.
Moving further, in Thailand, the percentage of petroleum products was 36% which was the highest as compared to the other four nations. On the contrary, South Korea used maximum percentage of hydro & wind fuel to generate electricity. Meanwhile, 49% of nuclear fuel and 39% of other fuel was used by Japan to produce electricity respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd of fuel to generate the electricity. Whereas, the least percentage of petroleum was ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d to produce electricity which was 67%. While, the proportion of all the other type o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, so, whereas, while, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03977272727 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8118343815 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4610660222 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232119731692 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115237868336 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433579706693 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163515852361 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307928848462 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.