Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time. This can benefit teenagers and the community as well. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
People’s opinions diverge regarding whether adolescents should be trained as volunteers in community campaigns in their spare time. Personally, I completely agree with this view.
For a variety of reasons, it would be beneficial to individuals in both physical and intellectual aspects. Firstly, due to the current education curriculums is in favor of academic knowledge, therefore students lack numerous practical experiences about life and work. This means that it is extremely worthwhile to permit teenagers to take part in and become a part of valuable movements that might provide a plethora of meritable knowledge for undergraduates in the later journeys of life.
Secondly, in today’s modern and technological world, people are more likely to be attracted by video games, social media, and other useless pleasures, therefore leading to undesirable diseases related to obesity, eyes, and mental problems. If individuals have an opportunity to engage in unpaid community work as volunteers, they can gain fundamental etiquette and exceptional abilities which is a bedrock of future jobs such as teamwork, public speaking, and be more responsible with their behaviors. As a result, when residents and social events improve, eventually prosper and contribute to society as a whole.
In summary, it seems to me that both individuals and the community will be beneficial when allowing adolescents to be volunteers in unpaid events.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in summary, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 219.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62100456621 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14362918513 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.662100456621 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4128501622 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.777777778 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210907474857 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745973084082 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595176014524 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126455578095 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546812801968 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.