Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is an open question whether the entity of punishments for people who go against the law should depend on the circumstances that have led to the crime, or if they should be universal. While it may be true that some crimes should be equally punished to not overcomplicate the judgment of every single case, I strongly believe that the most serious crimes should be judged one by one.
On the one hand, punishing in the same way people who are guilty of the same crime has two advantages. It is simpler, since once a judgment is been done for one case, it does not have to be done again for other similar situation. In addition, it also deters people from committing a certain crime. If the years of jail of the sum that should be paid for a certain infraction is well known, individuals will know clearly the consequence that their bad action would have, and they could previously understand that it would not be convenient to commit a crime.
On the other hand, giving different punishments depending on the circumstances could be a fairer approach in some situations. As a matter of fact, an organized crime is very different from an accidental killing. Even though these two events have the same results, the criminal could have been more or less willing to commit it, and thus its punishment should vary. For example, a driver who has an accident that involves the death of an individual should not have the same judgment of a terrorist that decides intentionally to kill somebody. As a matter of fact, while the former would not be a problem for society in the future, the latter would commit the crime again, if not correctly punished.
In conclusion, crimes should be judged more or less objectively depending on their gravity. For the smallest ones, such as bullism, graffiti on the walls and vehicles’ infractions, the punishment should be strict and equal for everybody. Nevertheless, when moving to more serious ones, circumstances should be taken into consideration and every single case should be judged apart from others.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, more or less, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84045584046 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75082991157 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492877492877 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.1393271157 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.357142857 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0714285714 7.06120827912 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.502929314966 0.244688304435 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182810924954 0.084324248473 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712772514836 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341064437316 0.151304729494 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528797002993 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.