Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm

There is a controversial debate surrounding the issue of giving the criminal verdict for various types of crimes. Some people assert that it would be wise if there would be predetermined punishment regarding each sort of crimes. Others hold the opposite view and claim that judge should give their verdicts in accordance with the gained clues and condition of the wrongdoers. To me, the idea of the former party seems more appealing and in this essay I am going to delve to both points of views.

Firstly, in favor of the first party, fix punishment should impose on delinquents as their punishment. Possession of these kinds of sentences would somehow lead to existence of contemporary alert that always warn people not to committing any crime. So they do not dare to break a law or right, in the light of the fact that they are aware of what is waiting for them. For example, if a person kill an individual on purpose an sentences of execution is inevitable. Therefore, maybe a handful if people have tendency to even think about that, no matter how menace the person is.

Secondly, when it comes to former party, the process would be extremely sophisticated since it demands an overwhelming investigation with regard to finding out about the motives and root of intention to doing crimes. Similarly, experts should look into every aspect of that matter in order to realize what stem to doing that either directly or indirectly. For instance, transportation of drugs is intensively prohibited, although a large number of that happen unexpectedly by embedding them in innocent people cars or properties. Thus, by checking out documents and cues, the rate of accusation of a person would readily be more precise. Nevertheless, it is not simple most of the time and some occasions not only result in not finding the real culprits, but also cause to unfair punishment.

To put it into a nutshell, passing fix sentences would lead to dramatic drop in crimes in the communities. Although, consideration of conditions of committing delinquencies and main ground for doing wrongdoing is indispensable, making the right and accurate decision would be hard to reach by judges sometimes.

Votes
Average: 9.6 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... a person kill an individual on purpose an sentences of execution is inevitable. T...
^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an sentence' or simply 'sentences'?
Suggestion: an sentence; sentences
... a person kill an individual on purpose an sentences of execution is inevitable. Therefore, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ugs is intensively prohibited, although a large number of that happen unexpectedly by embedding t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, sort of, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01098901099 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93043154748 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9070193514 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4375 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277157504225 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754814665145 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459837993004 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154751979886 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194684481659 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.