Commuting is an essential part of daily living in cities. Although some feel that car is a better way of city transport, I, however, believe that cycling has more merits.
Driving car is a comfortable way of transport. While driving car, all weather changes are more or less not important as environment in car is easily adjustable by air condition, furthermore, during rain or snow, people are still in comfort of their car. Increasing number of cars in cities lead to traffic jams where vast amount of time is spent. As a result, people have less time for leisure activities as they spent vast of the time in traffic. Furthermore, most importantly, skyrocketing number of cars in cities follow with more pollutions being emitted as a result of burning of fossil fuel; it is a serious threat for urban eco-system.
Although, I side with those who feel that cycling is a better way of transport in urban areas. Not only is cycling healthy, but also eco-friendly. People who cycle to work are way faster and mostly not traffic dependant as many cities built designated routes for cyclist. Moreover, risk of civilisation diseases is lowered owning to physical activity while cycling. American heart association had proven a positive impact of 30 minutes of daily physical activity as a prevention of heart attack and another vascular diseases. Last, but not least, riding a bike is eco-friendly as no pollutions are exposed into the air. Undoubtedly is Amsterdam one of the clearest metropolitan area due to the vast majority of dwellers choosing bike as a better way of transport.
In short, although driving car as a way fo transport has some merits, therefore, on balance, I believe that riding bike is not only individual's benefit, but also advantage for urban eco-system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...erious threat for urban eco-system. Although, I side with those who feel that cyclin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 730, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bike'
Suggestion: to bike
... the vast majority of dwellers choosing bike as a better way of transport. In sh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, in short, as a result, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98657718121 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85155140842 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1542509553 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174415792947 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576518952053 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610911954699 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118773781781 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427493386018 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.