Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports for younger children).
To what extend do you agree of disagree?
As one of the most vital elements leading to students’ success, non-profit community service should always be the most significant part of high school organizations. However, there is an existing idea that these extracurricular activities can distract pupils from studying. Whether, adding community service to programs is a prevalent topic. Pondering upon this issue, I hold strong interest on putting volunteer works into agenda.
First and foremost, a much more successful future recruitment is what I put in my priority. Admittedly, in short term, unpaid jobs for community organizations take up some time of students to spend on school’s assignments. However, if considering this in long-sighted perspective, students participating in non-profit community activities will guarantee more success in employment. Therefore, with sufficient life experiences, work and negotiation skills gained, pupils are offered high chance to be selected in top universities become more competitive in job markets after graduation. Thanks to establishing volunteer service in schools’ programs, students will inaugurate these skills into practice, which potentially make them dominant in modern working world. Beyond any doubt, unpaid community works enable students to attain more secured successful recruitment.
The further point to be bear in mind is that community service inculcates students’ sense of responsibility and empathy towards society, which essentially shape their strong and independent personality and aptitudes. After helping disadvantaged ones, pupils are bound to realize how valuable and meaningful the life is. As a result, there will be more attentions to special groups in the future. Furthermore, due to non-profit volunteer works for community, students are able to refrain from committing with irresponsible behaviors. By and large, empathy and responsibility are irrefutable advantages that community service brings.
In conclusion, successful employment and building better characteristics are tenable reasons for my preference. Taking my analysis into meticulous consideration, I believe that schools should add more volunteer extracurricular activities into compulsory agenda.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ties can distract pupils from studying. Whether, adding community service to programs i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, in short, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12540192926 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33691732209 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627009646302 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.123785776 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.058823529 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211002425433 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641353754571 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046162783719 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127819623894 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151808912067 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.27 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.