All around the world in every country the school curriculum is changing with the passage of time. Due to the need of society and the world different courses are being added or some are removed from the educational program. Some people have the idea that extracurricular activities such as charitable work should be included as their regular course. I partly agree with this statement and in the following paragraphs, I will describe where I agreed and where not.
First of all, by doing humanitarian works young pupils will learn to help the people, therefore, in their mentality positivity will be improved. Moreover, their social manner will be developed. Secondly, charity work such as teaching illiterate persons will increase the literacy rate. For instance, in Khulna University, the students have made a club that targets to teach the unlettered people. It is not possible for them to educate everyone, therefore, the school students come forward and the school authority should help them. Thirdly, environmental pollution, the students can arrange a camping program to make people concern about the pollution and try to make them understand the effects of contamination. All these works will improve their morality, in addition, will help them to be a responsible member of society. Hence, these types of works should be added to their courses.
On the other hand, without being given more attention to social work a student should give more concentration on their studies like mathematics, physics, and so on. By studying these courses students can learn up-to-date technology, which theories, and practicality will help them to do well in the future. If the students are busy with nonprofit works, as a result, they will get good grades in the exam, and in the long term, they will suffer from this.
In conclusion, to sum up all the points above, have a good grade or a good job can not make a man perfect and useful for society. To be a good member he should upgrade himself with morality. So, the schools should make their curriculum in a way that students can do both social work and study.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98866855524 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70309589979 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541076487252 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6995926258 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6111111111 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188629075847 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655763961491 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410300850752 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113286982418 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528361789409 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.