Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sport to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
<p class="MsoNormal"><br></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Lucida Sans Unicode", sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">Some people think that community service without payment </span><span class="hiddengrammarerror">should be</span> made compulsory for high school students. I completely disagree with this view due to the scarcity of a student’s time
and to the undesirable output of work that any kind of compulsory policy may
bring. </p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Lucida Sans Unicode", sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">On the one hand, as a full-time student, a teenager has a limited amount of time as an ordinary nine-to-five worker does. Apart from attending classes, a typical high school student is often preoccupied with the colossal amount of homework assigned by almost all teachers. Besides, the pressure of constant examinations coupled with the need for creating a good-looking academic record by </span>involving in extracurricular activities literally <span class="hiddensuggestion">render</span> them exhausted. Thus, it is almost impossible for students to overtake one more activity which <span class="hiddengrammarerror">is regarded</span> as compulsory. It would be better should the amount of their spare time is spent either for recreational activities or with their family and friends. On the other hand, the results produced by students through this kind of policy may well be below standard and undesirable. Firstly, instead of spending their time playing computer games, for example, they have to take part in an activity which does not give them any financial rewards but also deprived them of their time. This, in the long run, will be likely to cause resentment
and condemnation among teenagers. Consequently, they tend to perform the job half-heartedly, thus bringing about the unproductive results which would be otherwise better if done out of their own volition. It can<span class="hiddengrammarerror"> be suggested </span>that there would be a performance appraisal after every task <span class="hiddengrammarerror">has been done</span>. However, no one will expect punishment to be imposed on those who do not meet the given criteria. Therefore, quality of work would be unlikely <span class="hiddengrammarerror"><span pre="unlikely " style="cursor: default;">to </span>be improved, or even worse, would gradually decline. In conclusion, it is neither sensible nor practical to force high school students to do unpaid work. This </span><span class="hiddengrammarerror">will not be</span> in the interest of both students and society.<span style="font-size:16.0pt;line-height:107%"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 718, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or even worse, would gradually decline. In conclusion, it is neither sensible no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2899.0 1615.20841683 179% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 7.39540816327 5.12529762239 144% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 7.54997536549 2.80592935109 269% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609693877551 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 812.7 506.74238477 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 124.849346714 49.4020404114 253% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 181.1875 106.682146367 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4375 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0875442935875 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458356989125 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350642667143 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672903550649 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00599431257219 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.7 13.0946893788 196% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 4.82 50.2224549098 10% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.6 11.3001002004 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 25.94 12.4159519038 209% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 9.78957915832 276% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 26.0 10.7795591182 241% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.