Many citizens are convinced that the annoyance stemming from mobile phones users is just the same as smoking and should be prohibited. Notwithstanding, I take my own stance that mobile phones in public will never be banned for some reasons.
On one hand, there are too many benefits for people not to carry their mobile phones around. Initiall, everyone really have to be conscious of the way to make use of a phone. While in public, always bear in mind to put your phone in silent mode or vibration so as to avoid putting others down. Secondly saying, entertaining yourself with your phone is undoubtedly great when going on a long trip. Furthermore, visitors really really need online maps on their mobile phones! Last but not least, the main purpose of a phone is for emercency. Granted, calling 911 when you are in trouble with crime or receiving an emercency message from workplace or in the family is all conducted with your phone.
On the other hand, nevertheless, there are also some drawbacks, which should be awared of. For the first reason, kids and teenagers usually in the habit of turning loud thier phone speakers while using, irrespective of public place of personal one. For the second one, if anyone is too focused on thier phone, how can they take any notice of what is happening around them. Thereby, they may make silly mistakes like crashing obstacles on the road or just simply get off the wrong station. Another reason, without exception, everyone will be too reliant on mobile phones. Hence, they will get used to using phones to curb problems and gradually, it is impossible for them to part with it.
To recapitulate, the advantages still seem to hold more appeals to me. Why, since the disadvantages can never outweigh its good one. Try to make the best use of your phone, it is truly a revolutionary invention!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 260, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... your phone in silent mode or vibration so as to avoid putting others down. Secondly say...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 421, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: really
...g on a long trip. Furthermore, visitors really really need online maps on their mobile phones...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, still, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77742946708 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5745400375 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617554858934 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1810753943 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.6470588235 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284624986805 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876385998536 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627260211787 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176327804859 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807441985257 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.