Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country’s police or military force, such as army, while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs? Discuss both views and give your own opinion ?
Nowadays disparities between genders are disappearing day by day so that is why regime provide the equal rights to both sexes. However, the section of society deems that females should services similar in police or army forces as compared with males because they have strong mental powers, well-educated, and etcetera whilst others neglect the reason is that ladies are physically weak, easily emotional as well. This easy will shed light on both perceptions along with my notion.
The one school of thought claims that the contribution in regime’s police and military forces is same as gentlemen which should be given by females. According to an initial prospective, the ladies of modern world’s are higher educated rather than previous periods so they have vastly knowledge about their nation’s constitutions and rights. In addition to this, they provide a huge proportion of their efforts for the progress of police and military jobs. In contrast, the mental abilities of women are very sharp than men so that is why they have eligible to solve the complications with their great mind powers. For example, famous IPS officer Kiran Bedi is well-educated and joined police service by passed the IPS exam which illustrates her mental ability as well as her education background.
The another school of thought said that ladies are never eligible for police or army jobs because they lead to lots of weakness. Moving further, the major is that the physical strength of females are never more powerful like men. On the other hand, they service of police and military required a large percentage of physical power which never offered by women. Furthermore, the physical strength not only major source for these types of jobs but also these services are depending on around o’ clock who are not suitable for females. The another main concerning area is that a drastic amount of emotional feelings observed among ladies so that is why they lost their temper quickly to face any perilous conditions. For instance, IPS officer Rani Sharma, lost her mental thinking when her family caught by a group of terrorist to release their boss in the Jail.
In my notion, I accord with first statement the factor is that it is not mandatory that women are mentally and physically weak because today majority of females are attending self-defensive class and able to protect own self. Due to these, they offer their best participation to these kinds of jobs. For example, Army officer, Kamalpreet Kaur is one of example for females which faced group of 10 criminals together who escaped school van and officer caught those terrorist and sent them in prison. In other words, it is an essential for females to do that kind of service to show their potential to the globe.
In conclusion, although, ladies are weaker in earlier times but now they have more strong and powerful that is why the eligible to do services in police and military .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 467, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...e types of jobs but also these services are depending on around o' clock who are not sui...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 166, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...le to do services in police and military .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2471.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 489.0 315.596192385 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05316973415 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61119318752 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521472392638 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 780.3 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.8492915137 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.052631579 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7368421053 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05263157895 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183773867792 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603104685166 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351843123772 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098882418323 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380531201597 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.