Different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1950, 1970 and 1990 are discussed in the graph below. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the bar chart. You should write at least 150 words.
The bar graph illustrates the information about the terms of percentage of four various modes of transport (Bus, Car, Bike and Foot) expand to commute to and from work which was in 4 decades in particular European urban area during 1950 and 1990.
In overall, people who went to work and other places by foot constituted a major in first given year since used of car for commuting at work at least. Whilst, car was using higher at the end of the period. However, there were a lots of transformation can be noticed in the expand proportion of all transport modes over the period.
It can be seen from the information that reached to work places as well as other destinations by walking were most popular among people in the bigning of the period which accounted at more than a third during 1950. Similarly, after two decades it reduced at less than a fifth in specific European city. In addition to this, a drastic decrease can be observed in walking on work at over a 6% at the last year. In contrast, there were not any significant variations had experienced in the expand of bus for commuting at work and travel in given years which were found at around a fifth, a quarter and 15% respectively in particular city of Europe.
The chart further proves that the utilised of car by humans to travel and from work attained a minimum figure at 5% between 19950. Interestingly, the percentage of used car by masses inclined dramatically and reached to peak at approximately two fifth at the end of the period in one European citified area. Even though, a negligible disparity of nearly 7% had experienced of expanding bike for commuting and work of the total percentage from 1950 (27%) to 1970 (20%). Lastly, only 5% people interested to used bike to commute and from work in particular city of Europe region in remained year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
... end of the period. However, there were a lots of transformation can be noticed in the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ots of transformation can be noticed in the expand proportion of all transport modes over...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsformation can be noticed in the expand proportion of all transport modes over t...
^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...most popular among people in the bigning of the period which accounted at more th...
^^
Line 7, column 485, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...gnificant variations had experienced in the expand of bus for commuting at work and travel...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, similarly, third, well, at least, in addition, in contrast, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 33.7804878049 219% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 965.302439024 157% => OK
No of words: 323.0 196.424390244 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68730650155 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68733146897 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498452012384 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 283.868780488 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2940568207 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261138590638 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102077848467 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389708709283 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174144012525 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286258114023 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.